KMID : 0939920220540030834
|
|
´ëÇѾÏÇÐȸÁö 2022 Volume.54 No. 3 p.834 ~ p.841
|
|
Validation of Korean Version of the COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) among Breast Cancer Survivors
|
|
Shim Sung-Keun
Kang Dan-Bee Kim Na-Yeon Han Ga-Yeon Lim Ji-Hyun Kim Hyun-Soo Park Jeong-Hyun Lee Man-Kyung Lee Jeong-Eon Kim Seok-Won Yu Jong-Han Chae Byung-Joo Ryu Jai-Min Nam Seok-Jin Lee Se-Kyung Cho Ju-Hee
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Purpose: Little is known about the impact of financial toxicity in disease-free breast cancer survivors. We aim to validate the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity in Korean (COST-K) and evaluate financial toxicity among disease-free breast cancer survivors.
Materials and Methods: We conducted linguistic validation following a standardized methodology recommended by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy multilingual translation (FACITtrans). For psychometric validation, we conducted a cross-sectional survey with 4,297 disease-free breast cancer survivors at a tertiary hospital in Seoul, Korea between November 2018 and April 2019. Survivors were asked to complete the COST-K and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaires. The test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and validity of the COST-K were assessed using standard scale construction techniques.
Results: The COST-K demonstrated good internal consistency, with a Cronbach¡¯s ¥á of 0.81. The test-retest analysis revealed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.78. The COST-K had moderate correlation (r=?0.60) with the financial difficulty item of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and week correlation with the items on acute and chronic symptom burdens (nausea/vomiting, ?0.18; constipation, ?0.14; diarrhea, ?0.14), showing good convergent and divergent validity. The median COST-K was 27 (range, 0 to 44; mean¡¾standard deivation [SD], 27.1¡¾7.5) and about 30% and 5% of cancer survivors experienced mild and severe financial toxicity, respectively. Younger age, lower education, lower household income was associated with higher financial toxicity.
Conclusion: The COST-K is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring financial toxicity in disease-free breast cancer survivors. Considering its impact on the health-related quality of life, more studies need to be conducted to evaluate financial toxicity in cancer survivors and design interventions.
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
Financial stress, Quality of life, Breast neoplasms, Cancer survivors, Validation study
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|